[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section”][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” _builder_version=”3.0.86″]<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image _builder_version=”3.0.86″ src=”https:\/\/www.flxon.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/KEYS-01.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url_new_window=”off” use_overlay=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” force_fullwidth=”off” show_bottom_space=”on” \/][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” _builder_version=”3.0.86″ text_orientation=”justified” module_alignment=”justified”]<\/p>\n
In previous articles, I discussed \u201cBottom Line\u201d profits and losses and how everyone needs to be held accountable to ensure profits are held to their maximum. I also discussed personnel, training, and the importance of establishing procedures.<\/p>\n
We all know that money is lost in the printing process, in part due to issues I discussed earlier. Unfortunately, a majority of our profits are lost during the period from when the job actually starts to when the job is completed. The quality of tools we use (cylinders, ink\/ink filtration, and doctor blades) are directly related to whether or not we have a positive\/negative profit margin, and if we, as printers, decide to purchase these tools based on cost alone, we can only expect to get what we pay for.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” _builder_version=”3.0.86″]<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” _builder_version=”3.0.86″ text_orientation=”justified” module_alignment=”justified”]<\/p>\n
All three \u201cKey Elements\u201d (cylinders, Ink filtration and doctor blades) are equally important; however, I need to discuss them in this specific order because cylinders and ink filtration directly impact the success or failure of doctor blades. These\u00a0three elements will be covered only as they relate to printers who are using solventbased ink\u2014the reason being that 95 percent of gravure printers in North America are solvent-based.<\/p>\n
Maintaining consistent quality of gravure cylinders affects your \u201cBottom Line,\u201d and RZ (chrome roughness) and HV (chrome hardness), the process elements of your cylinders, are most likely inconsistent from one cylinder to the next. And, what does this cause? Process variation!<\/p>\n
Cylinder quality is inconsistent for two primary reasons:<\/p>\n
Printers continue to allow cylinders to be delivered to their pressrooms with huge variations in both RZ and HV, but this is not only the engraver\u2019s responsibility. It\u2019s also the responsibility of the printer! These variations will create the need for the operator to investigate and determine what the causes of printing issues are during the run. They will cause printing defects, downtime, questionable product quality, and waste. If the operator cannot \u201ccure\u201d the issue completely while running the material, then from the point the issue started to the end of the roll may be complete waste.<\/p>\n
The RZ (chrome roughness) is necessary to:<\/p>\n
One of the biggest misconceptions in rotogravure is what the actual RZ roughness of the cylinder is and what it should be. Some customers will tell you that they have a spec of .20\u03bcm or .30\u03bcm. If they are testing with a Profilometer, this may be the case; however, the Profilometer does not\u00a0distinguish between a polish that is cylindrical (figure 1) and one that is diagonally polished (figure 2). The illustration below shows that both types of polish direction could have the same RZ value.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.86″ background_layout=”light”]<\/p>\n
Figure 1. Cylindrical Polish<\/strong><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image _builder_version=”3.0.86″ src=”https:\/\/www.flxon.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/FLXON_rotogravire-cylinder-polish-figure-1-01.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url_new_window=”off” use_overlay=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” force_fullwidth=”off” show_bottom_space=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.86″ background_layout=”light”]<\/p>\n Figure 2. Diagonal Polish<\/strong><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image _builder_version=”3.0.86″ src=”https:\/\/www.flxon.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/FLXON_rotogravire-cylinder-polish-figure-2-01.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url_new_window=”off” use_overlay=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” force_fullwidth=”off” show_bottom_space=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” _builder_version=”3.0.86″ header_text_align=”justify”]<\/p>\n It is extremely important to specify not only the RZ value to your cylinder supplier, but also the direction as well. There is no question in my mind that the most effective polish direction is 45\u00b0. I have also found that a diagonal polish in a single direction is much more effective than a \u201ccross polish\u201d or \u201cS\u201d polish, which is commonly put in by our cylinder vendors.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” _builder_version=”3.0.86″ text_orientation=”justified” module_alignment=”justified”]<\/p>\n Polishing in the copper seems to be much more effective than just polishing in the chrome. There is some dispute as to why this is effective. The question stems from the fact that when the polishing is done in the copper and then plated with chrome, the thickness of the chrome is 20 times the thickness of the original RZ put into the copper (figure 3). Once the finished chrome is polished, the copper RZ, which was mirrored by the chrome, is removed.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.86″ background_layout=”light”]<\/p>\n Figure 3.<\/strong><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image _builder_version=”3.0.86″ src=”https:\/\/www.flxon.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Figure-3-01-01.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url_new_window=”off” use_overlay=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” force_fullwidth=”off” show_bottom_space=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” _builder_version=”3.0.86″ text_orientation=”justified” module_alignment=”justified”]<\/p>\n However, since the normal polishing technique is to stone polish in the copper (current method figure 4), there are already cylindrical polishing scratches in the copper. This along with the \u201cCross\u201d or \u201cS\u201d polishing done in the chrome may be detrimental to the effectiveness of the overall polish. If possible, lowering the stone 25 percent (45\u00b0 polish method figure 4) will create a much better polishing profile, which will add to the overall polishing effectiveness.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.86″ background_layout=”light”]<\/p>\n Figure 4.<\/strong><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image _builder_version=”3.0.86″ src=”https:\/\/www.flxon.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Figure-4-01.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url_new_window=”off” use_overlay=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” force_fullwidth=”off” show_bottom_space=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” _builder_version=”3.0.86″ text_orientation=”justified” module_alignment=”justified”]<\/p>\n The finish chrome RZ value that I found works the best for most applications is .40 \u03bcm for printing film and .60 \u03bcm for paper. The difference is the surface tension of the two substrates. The RZ can be verified with a profilometer as pictured below.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.86″ background_layout=”light”]<\/p>\n Figure 5.<\/strong><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image _builder_version=”3.0.86″ src=”https:\/\/www.flxon.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/SJ210.gif” show_in_lightbox=”off” url_new_window=”off” use_overlay=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” force_fullwidth=”off” show_bottom_space=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” _builder_version=”3.0.86″ text_orientation=”justified” module_alignment=”left”]<\/p>\n The HV or chrome hardness is extremely important for several reasons:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.86″ background_layout=”light”]<\/p>\n Figure 6. Hardness File Set<\/strong><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image _builder_version=”3.0.86″ src=”https:\/\/www.flxon.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Hardness-File.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url_new_window=”off” use_overlay=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” force_fullwidth=”off” show_bottom_space=”on” \/][et_pb_image _builder_version=”3.0.86″ src=”https:\/\/www.flxon.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Hardness-File-Kit.jpg” show_in_lightbox=”off” url_new_window=”off” use_overlay=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” force_fullwidth=”off” show_bottom_space=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” _builder_version=”3.0.86″ text_orientation=”justified” module_alignment=”justified”]<\/p>\n The thickness is also important in regard to cylinder life. Make sure that you are getting what you pay for. It\u2019s a good idea to spot check cylinders periodically using an \u201cIsoscope\u201d (figure 7).\u00a0\u00a0In order to control your process, you must make sure your cylinder specifications are correct before and after the run. It is well worth the cost to create a position of \u201cCylinder inspector\u201d whose duties should include: testing incoming cylinders (HV, RZ); testing cylinders after the run; cylinder spot repair; and shipping\/receiving\u00a0cylinders. This will help eliminate cylinders as one of the suspects if problems arise during the run.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.86″ background_layout=”light”]<\/p>\n Figure 7. Isoscope<\/strong><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image _builder_version=”3.0.86″ src=”https:\/\/www.flxon.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Figure-7-01.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url_new_window=”off” use_overlay=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” force_fullwidth=”off” show_bottom_space=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.86″ background_layout=”light”]<\/p>\n Do your operators polish the cylinders during the run? Why do you feel they do this? It\u2019s because they are restoring the polish that has been worn off!\u00a0Unfortunately, this is another weak area for both engravers and printers. Rarely does the engraver know the chrome hardness he is delivering to his customer, and, in most cases, the printer has no idea.<\/p>\n The reason, according to the engravers, is that they feel there is no way to properly check chrome hardness other than sending in a chip for analysis. This takes time and money and may only take place once per month. The problems are: What if the chrome bath is contaminated on the day after the analysis? And, what about the quality of the cylinders for the next 30 days?<\/p>\n I have found a simple tool to use for the \u201cGo\/No Go\u201d decision-making process. This tool is by no means \u201cDead on\u201d accurate; however, it will give you enough information to determine whether or not\u00a0your cylinders are hard enough to hold up against the doctor blade you are using. A standard carbon steel doctor blade is 550HV. If your doctor blade is harder than the cylinder, your cylinder may degrade. This tool will test hardness up to 865HV. If your cylinders test harder than 865HV and the blade you are using is 550HV, you should be safe from chrome degradation and severe scoring.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.86″ background_layout=”light”]<\/p>\n Figure 8. Example of a banded cylinder<\/strong><\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_image _builder_version=”3.0.86″ src=”https:\/\/www.flxon.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/Diagonal-vs.-Cross-Polish-01-01.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url_new_window=”off” use_overlay=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” force_fullwidth=”off” show_bottom_space=”on” \/][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” _builder_version=”3.0.86″ text_orientation=”justified” module_alignment=”justified”]<\/p>\n Get involved with your engraver and work together to set up specifications that work best for your application. Have a banded cylinder done with several different polishes to determine what works best for you. Once your specifications are set, hold everyone accountable for maintaining these specifications.<\/p>\n Note: I have visited several engravers and have found their process to be very impressive. These engravers do want what\u2019s best for their customers. Sometimes, surprisingly, it\u2019s the printer who doesn\u2019t ask for or expect the best.<\/p>\n To recap what we have discussed so far:<\/p>\n All of the Key Elements must be held to a tight standard to eliminate process variation. Do not accept a range for tolerances. Pick a value and expect that value. This will reduce process variation.<\/p>\n If you need help with assessments or training for the best doctor blade solution, contact one of our experts for a consultative evaluation. Our team will be able to help you with solutions.<\/p>\nHV – CHROME HARDNESS<\/strong><\/h5>\n
\n
\n
CHROME THICKNESS<\/strong><\/h5>\n
\n
Download Technical Article<\/strong><\/h5>\n